Carnivor3s news » creen or sweets. Weve taken the approach that we

If you enjoyed the U.S. womens soccer team hilarious mock album cover last week, then you are going to love their latest gift to the Interwebs. Pulling a Destinys Child, the squad swapped out Sydney Leroux and Emily Sonnett (sorry, ladies!) and replaced them with Ali Krieger and former team member Lori Lindsey and posed for another epic photo on Wednesday before heading off to Rio.Obviously, its in black-and-white to maximize the dramatic effect:I know this a joke and all, but if the Golf Boys can release not one but two singles, I see no reason why this group couldnt do the same.See something entertaining on social media that you think deserves to be shared? Let me know on Twitter, @darcymaine_espn. Mike Edwards Buccaneers Jersey . -- Matt Kuchar and Harris English ran away with the Franklin Templeton Shootout, shooting a 14-under 58 on Sunday in the final-round scramble to break the tournament course record. Mike Alstott Youth Jersey .Y. -- Bills receiver Stevie Johnson has a bone to pick with the NFL schedule maker. http://www.authenticbuccaneerspro.com/Jamel-dean-buccaneers-jersey/ . Kozun faked to the forehand and beat Monsters starter, Calvin Pickard, pad side in the second round for the winner. Spencer Abbott also scored in the shootout for the Marlies (25-13-4). Gerald McCoy Youth Jersey . Ivanovic was leading 7-5, 1-0 when Hantuchova withdrew after falling 0-40 behind in the second game. The match started slowly for Ivanovic, who surrendered her first two serves as Hantuchova took a 5-3 lead. Jamel Dean Youth Jersey .B. -- The Baie-Comeau Drakkar took over sole possession of first place atop the Quebec Major Junior Hockey League on Thursday with their sixth straight win. The ICC has said it does not agree with Cricket South Africas assertion that law 42.3 is unclear in its definition of what constitutes an artificial substance and is disappointed with Faf du Plessis decision to appeal his guilty verdict for ball-tampering. Although the ICC cannot comment about the matter in detail until the appeal is heard, CEO David Richardson addressed the media in Adelaide and emphasised his organisations understanding of the fair- and unfair-play laws.These state that a player should not use artificial substances to shine the ball, Richardons statement read. The ICC understands that to include, but is not limited to, sunscreen, lip ice and residue from sweets.He confirmed that the ICC does not wish to prevent players from using these substances for legitimate purposes. However, any deliberate attempt to apply such substances to the ball, as was the case here, will not be acceptable.Richardson did not rule out the possibility that the law could be changed, but stressed that until such an amendment, the laws in their current form will be applied. This will continue to be reported and the ICC confirms that unless the Laws are changed, the current practice of charging players when the evidence shows an obvious breach will continue. ICC Umpires will remind all teams of the Laws as they stand.While CSA chief executive Haroon Lorgat said he hoped to engage with the ICC at their next cricket committee meeting in May - and said it was due for discussion even before the du Plessis incident - Richardson confirmed it could be put on the agenda in light of the recent saga. I think he (Lorgat) jumped the gun in saying its on the agenda. But I think that in light of this incident and of other comments being made by players around the world, I think its fair to say it should be discussed by the cricket committee going forward.Any discussions would be part of what Richardson called a two-stage process, the first of which would concentrate on the appeal. A date has not been set but the ICC said the appeal would be heard at the earliest convenience. Although the ICC recognised du Plessis right to appeal, Richardson maintained that CSAs conduct, in particular the press conference at the MCG when Hashim Amla stood with the entire squad alongside him and dismissed the allegations against du Plessis, was disrespecting the process.I think its fair to say Im disappointed that they dont respect that the laws are there. They are there and the process is not necessarily respected. I was disappointed in the initial sort of comment that this is a joke - that kind of comment, he said. But full marks to them, subsequent to that theyve acknowledged we attend the hearing, go through the prrocess and follow it.dddddddddddd So perhaps that initial reaction I thought was uncalled for but subsequently its within their rights.Richardson did not read too much into the role broadcasters play in bringing transgressions of this law to light, comparing it to instances when the stump microphones pick up players bringing the game into disrepute. I dont think the players - or we - should be too worried or concerned about that (the broadcasters). Its a similar argument when it comes to bad language used around the stump microphones. If youre going to use bad language and somehow it is picked up by somebody - youve got to live with it. So decide what kind of behaviour you want to show and behave accordingly, he said.And, because it is not easy to monitor which artificial substances are being used, Richardson maintained that if someone is caught, they will be punished.This has always been an issue thats been quite difficult to police, he said. Even before we spoke about using mints and sweets, lip ice - and weve been using lip ice and sunscreen on our faces for years - we understand that inadvertently in shining the ball theres a potential for it to get onto the ball. And for that reason were not going to go around wildly accusing players of cheating and using the lip ice, sunscreen or sweets. Weve taken the approach that we will only really charge someone if its obviously being done for that particular purpose.Theres two examples in the past. One was Rahul Dravid where he actually took the sweet and rubbed it on the ball, you probably couldnt get more obvious than that. And in our opinion this instance. So if anyone does something similar we will hopefully get to see it, treat it in exactly the same way weve treated Faf in this case. These decisions are not taken lightly because it was just so obvious under the current laws that we thought we had to report him.Asked what he thought about Steven Smiths acknowledgment that all players shine the ball the same way, Richardson distanced himself. Im not sure he exactly went that far as to say the same way he was talking about shining the ball.He moved even further away when asked to respond to Lorgats comment that Richardson himself was part of the South African brigade that shined the ball.I thought that comment was probably inappropriate but I can speak for myself and I can confirm I never - probably because I was the wicketkeeper and had no real need to shine the ball in any way, but I can confirm I never used - and I used lip-ice and sunscreen religiously for 30 years - and never put it on the ball. ' ' '